![]() |
|||||||
|
IN THIS EDITION
VOLUME 1 - ISSUE 4 April 2007 |
|||||||
ESS Austin Operations Manager John Jackson Retires
Do you know what the State of Texas requires for your security officers’ uniforms?The Department of Public Safety regulates the Private Security Industry. Texas Administrative Code Rule 35.39 outlines the Uniform Requirements for Private Security Officers. Each commissioned security officer (licensed to carry a weapon) must display the name of the company under whom they are employed, the word “Security” and identification which contains the last name of the security officer. Each non-commissioned officer (not licensed to carry a weapon) shall display either the name or board-approved logo of the company under whom the security officer is employed, or the name or the board-approved logo of the business entity with whom the employing company has contracted. They must also display the last name of the security officer and the word “Security.” The name of the company and the word “Security” shall be of a size, style, shape, design, and type which are clearly visible by a reasonable person under normal circumstances and must be on the outermost garment (i.e. raincoat or jacket). No private security bureau licensee shall display a badge, shoulder patch, logo or any other identification which contains the words “Law Enforcement” or similar words. Failure to comply with these State requirements could mean fines for the Guard Company as well as the Private Security Officer. For more information on Private Security requirements please visit http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/psb/. Families Who Have Recently Lost a Loved One Are Easy Targets for Scam ArtistsScam artists are preying on families who have recently lost a loved one. In times of grief you may be an easy target for a bogus claim for payment. Learn how to protect yourself from these scams by following these simple guidelines:
To read more about ways to protect yourself from scam artists, read this article in the Wall Street Journal: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117537720801955787.html Raiding the Supply Closet Hurts Companies' Pockets
Source: Journal News (NY) (04/02/07) ; Milford, Maureen IRS Found Lax in Protecting Taxpayer DataThousands of taxpayers could be at risk of identity theft or other financial fraud because the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has failed to adequately protect information on its 52,000 laptop computers and other storage systems, a new government report concludes. The IRS did not begin to adequately correct the security problems until the second half of 2006, despite being warned about them in 2003 and again in February 2006, according to a report by the inspector general of the IRS, J. Russell George. Nearly 500 IRS laptops were lost or stolen during that three and one half year period, many from the homes or cars of IRS workers but a significant number, 111, from IRS offices, the report found. The IRS says one laptop typically contains information on 10 to 25 tax cases. Although the missing laptops could not be examined, the inspector general’s staff tested 100 laptops currently used by IRS employees and found 44 had “unencrypted sensitive data, including taxpayer data and employee personnel data,” leading investigators to conclude “it is very likely a large number of the lost or stolen IRS computers contained similar unencrypted data.” No report of identity theft has been linked to the missing laptops, and no taxpayers have been alerted to the potential security breaches, IRS officials say. The report attributes the newly identified shortcomings at IRS offices “to a lack of emphasis by management.” Source: Washington Post (4/5/07) QUOTE OF THE MONTH: |
|||||||
|
|||||||